The "Size Inclusive" Buzz Word: What Fashion Brands Just Don't Get
Updated: Feb 19
Like so many others living and existing in fat bodies today, I have fallen victim to big brands touting "size inclusivity" to just be disappointed yet again that I find myself not fitting into their ideals of an acceptable full-figured woman. Either simply not offering anything above a 2X or 3X, or falsely claiming that they go up to a 6X when in reality it fits like a slim 2X, brands just don't understand or care about the role they play in continuing to feed this fat-phobic fashion industry with more damaging lies that have a direct impact on the mental health of young girls and women.
As more and more brands chase the illusion of being inclusive for the sake of sales, terms like "size inclusive" and "plus size" are being vastly misrepresented and mis-used causing confusion for shoppers. And, don't get me started on the poor representation of models on their websites and marketing further confusing consumers on how these garments will fit their body type! Picking a single, slightly thicker woman to be the token representative of an entire demographic whom, she herself, doesn't even wear a plus-size to begin with IS NOT the solution - you aren't fooling me!! FASHION INDUSTRY - STOP STOP STOP perpetuating these lies - your fat-phobia is showing.
Many brands that make a cheap attempt to extending their sizes, claim that due to difficult business results they have to stop production on their larger sizes... <clearing my throat> ahhem Ann Taylor Loft. What's more likely? 1) There aren't enough women wearing plus-sizes shopping for clothes at a median price point that results in low demand and poor sales...? ORRRRRRRRRR 2) Is it the fact that these brands don't really give a shit about this segment but want the clout for being "inclusive" so they just "make it bigger" with little-to-no validating resulting in poor fit, poor styling decisions and limited options that resulted in the decline in sales? I'm thinking the latter.
How is it possible that when 68% of women in America wear a plus size that the fashion industry is only comprised of less than 14% of plus-sized apparel?! Let me guess - the diet industry and the fashion industry have been profiting off of women's insecurities for decades and decades. Lack of representation in the fashion industry for marginalized body types implies that if you don't "fit in" you must shrink yourself to fit into an unrealistic, thin, white, cis-gendered female beauty standard... oh and the diet industry will surely help you do so! Oh, and if you are so lucky to find a brand that makes extended sizes amongst their straight-sized line, they put a piddly amount of product in-stores giving you only the option to shop online. Why? Well, because they don't want their skinny clients to feel uncomfortable that fat shoppers are shopping in the same store, therefore building shame around being in a fat body further feeding into the toxic fat-phobic, racist and misogynistic idealistic beauty standard - even if this is covered in a veil of 'size inclusivity'.
So, when I see brands claim inclusivity, I am immediately skeptical. Too many times now, recognizable large brands have claimed inclusive sizing to completely fall short on this promise. And those that continue to play in this sandbox are still missing in some areas to truly be inclusivity - and not just in the products they create, but also the executive leadership representing the brand (the high number of "plus size" brands led by white, middle-aged men is frighteningly true).
What do I look for when evaluating a brand's inclusivity?
1) Size Chart:
I keep my body measurements handy when shopping online especially with brands I haven't shopped with before. When looking at size charts, I know I am a traditional Women's 26/28 - and how that translates into alpha-numeric sizing is the major inconsistency across the apparel industry, but for shits and giggles I am a 4X across most plus-size specific brands. When looking at a brand's size chart, if they claim going up to a size 6X but their measurements correspond for that size smaller than 26/28 (4X), then I know that they are not true-to-size and simply not designing product for fat bodies.
2) Product Offering & Assortment:
If the "plus" options are limited, less than, or very different from the "regular" sizes, I know that they are approaching their extended sizes as an after-thought. They don't see fat bodies as equals to their thinner core customer therefore telling me that they are chasing a tick in a checkbox more than providing quality design and options for plus-sized consumers.